ListedTech
  • Data Portals
    • Portal for Industry
    • Portal for Institutions
    • Webinars
  • Product Categories & Reports
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Documentation
    • Webinars
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Data Overview
    • Traditional IT Research vs. ListEdTech
    • In the Media
    • Contact Us

Search the website...

Go to Portal
Posted on April 11, 2021 | by Justin Ménard

Average Lifespan of IT Systems in Higher Education

Higher Ed
Average Number of New Implementation Per Year - LisTedTECH

How much time a system is kept before it’s due to be replaced? What is the average lifespan of IT systems in a said product category? Is it time for our institution to change its systems? How many systems does an institution change per year? You guessed it, this post will talk about implementation numbers and the average lifespan of products.

When we look at the product categories and the average lifespan, we can better interpret the data by creating groups: 

  • administration of an institution, 

  • teaching and support to teaching,

  • student life and career 

  • evolution of the business. 

While the first three groups are self-explanatory, the evolution of the business group can be defined as systems that didn’t exist 10-20 years ago and that offer a service in an online form that existed previously in another form. In this group, we can put OPM, Proctor Systems, E-Portfolios, Payment Solutions, Catalog Management, MOOCs, OPM, etc.

When we look at the first graph, we can see that most systems that have the longest lifespan are in the administration group (Financial Systems – almost 22 years, HR – more than 20 years, SIS – almost 16 years, Document Management – around 15 years). On the other end of the spectrum, several systems in the student life and career as well as the evolution of the business are below the 10-year mark: EProcurement, Conferencing Systems, Scheduling – Room Management, E-Learning, Payment Solutions, E-Portfolios, MOOCs, Proctor Systems, Career Readiness, Retention, etc.

The Impact of Commercial Solutions in the System Decommissions

Our “Time a System is Kept” graph shows a trend since 1993. In fact, we can see the product lifespan is getting shorter and shorter over time. We believe that this trend is due to more commercial solutions being available and implemented while homegrown systems are abandoned. It’s easier for institutions to adopt non-homegrown solutions for maintenance, upgrade and support reasons, especially if they are offered by vendors as SaaS. Once they have abandoned their homegrown system, institutions will, most likely, not keep the commercial solution as long as they kept their homegrown system; they will switch to another solution as soon as the current system no longer meets their business requirements.

Over the years, we saw new product categories emerged. This could also explain why implementations have had a shorter lifespan.

Number of IT Systems Replaced Each Year in Institutions

Another question that we may ask is: how many systems are replaced each year within an institution? The table below shows the numbers of systems that changed per year (defined as new implementations; upgrades of current systems were excluded) regardless of their product categories. We note that institutions with bigger enrolment tend to implement more new systems in a year than smaller institutions.

When looking at the data, we see an acceleration of new implementations in the past 20 years. This is more visible in the institutions with an enrollment of over 5000. A few of the reasons that can explain this trend is that institutions have access to more options. It’s easier to migrate from one system to another and we believe students have higher expectations.

Post navigation

Turnitin Acquiring Ouriginal: what’s left on the market
Cloud Nine for Ellucian
  • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
  • CAPTCHA image

    * All fields are required.

  • Listen to Our Podcast


  • Recent Posts

    • Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders? October 15, 2025
    • Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus October 1, 2025
    • Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech September 24, 2025
    • Thesis: From Unit4 Spin‑Off to SIS Specialist September 17, 2025
    • How Institutions Discover What Tech Their Peers Are Using September 3, 2025

Stay in the know…

Blog & News
Higher Ed Market Data

Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?

This year, I’ve been revisiting some of the classic business books: Blue Ocean Shift, Free, The Innovator’s Dilemma, Zero to One, and of course, Crossing the Chasm. That last one really got me thinking about early adopters. In tech markets, they’re the people (or in HigherEd, the institutions) who are comfortable taking risks, trying something new, and shaping the market ... Who Are HigherEd’s Tech Leaders?  Read More
Market Data Market Movements

Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus

September 2025 marked a major turning point for Anthology, the owner of Blackboard and several other higher education technology platforms. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. after efforts to sell itself or parts of its business outside of court failed. The filing is not a liquidation. Instead, it is a structured reorganization designed to ... Anthology’s Chapter 11 Filing: Breaking Up to Refocus  Read More
ListEdTech Market Data

Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech

Market saturation is a concept we often discuss at ListEdTech because it comes up frequently with our clients. Investors want to know if a market still has room to grow, while startups want to understand whether they are entering a space with opportunities or one that is already crowded. Last year, we explored saturation by ... Rethinking Market Saturation in EdTech  Read More
Footer Logo - LisTedTECH
  • Contact Us
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use